If you’re like me, your head is about to explode from iPod overload. Can you still find something about a new iPod DJ mixer to love? Maybe: this one lets you connect other players and USB storage and scratch, change pitch, and loop. It might even appeal as a portable scratcher/sampler. And you can use it to play FLAC and OGG files, meaning you could dock it in your living room to play back all that glitchy, indie music you’ve been buying in the seldom-trod corners of online music stores. (Read: not the iTunes Music Store.) In fact, you don’t really even need an iPod. Here’s a first look at Numark’s second take on the iDJ — and some details on why we might just have to give it a second chance.

The iDJ, Numark’s original iPod DJ mixer, got plenty of buzz from iPod lovers — and plenty of haters here on CDM. And why not? It’s not about snobbery: the iDJ just sucked the joy out of DJing, thanks to the lack of scratching, pitch control, and having to go out and buy two iPods. If you’re a newcomer, you just won’t have as much fun with the iDJ. And as for the wedding DJs this seemed aimed at, why shouldn’t you have smooth, beat-matched crossfades at your wedding? (See my review for Playlist.com.)

So, I’m sure some of you rolled your eyes when you heard about Numark’s iDJ2. But wait a second here . . . now you can scratch? And you only need one iPod, since you can play two songs off of it at once? And Numark added not only pitch control but loop cross-fading? And you can use any USB hard drive (including players like my iRiver H320) or even a MemoryStick? All these new features are possible because the iDJ2 treats these devices as USB mass storage, rather than taking simple audio output from the built-in playback on the iPod. That’s a huge step forward from the iDJ, which was basically a glorified iPod dock with a cheap mixer thrown in.

Numark even earned a little street cred by adding FLAC and OGG support, two high-quality compressed formats now available from some indie online labels and music stores. I’ve been listening to the Autechre reissues in FLAC from Bleep, and I have to say, this format sounds really great.

In fact, looking at the specs of Numark’s iDJ2, it’s almost as though . . . get ready for this . . . they listened to feedback from their customers and product reviews. That alone should warrant giving this a second shot.

So, while there are still lots of questions about how this works, and more importantly, how much it will cost, I’m looking forward to checking out the iDJ2. I can even imagine using this in a laptop music setup as a portable scratcher, loaded with samples on USB drives, for those of us who are already carrying too much gear to add a turntable. I’m also hoping the device will transmit MIDI to a laptop, like the NuVJ also introduced at Messe, though I’m less optimistic about that. (I’ll let you know; it might also connect via USB.)

Yes, I’m sure this will still be offensive to real turntablists, and more power to you. But as an upgrade for the CD-based DJ, it does look promising.

The iDJ2 wasn’t the only iPod product Numark unveiled at Messe. The iCDX is a strange combination of a CD scratch unit with an iPod device. Like the iDJ2, it treats the iPod (or other hard drive) as a USB storage device. This one has a real scratch wheel, and connects via USB; Numark tantalizingly notes that it works as a standard Human Interface Device, meaning some of our more experimental and adventurous readers can do crazy things like connect the iCDX to Max/MSP or Pd. And while the iDJ2 has only large plastic discs for simulating scratching, the iCDX appears to have a more serious scratch ring.

What’s your take? Is it possible Numark devised an iPod product we might actually want?

Numark iDJ2

  • dawhead

    Just want to make sure that you and your readers understand that the reason FLAC sounds so good is that it uses lossless compression (similar, though more audio-specific, to zip etc). This makes it totally different from "compressed" formats that use psycho-acoustics to throw away information in the data on the basis that you can't hear (much) difference. Using FLAC is not similar to using mp3, ogg or aac; its basically like using a zip'ed wave file. The files are bigger (compression ratio is about 2:1, versus more typical 10:1 for lossy compression), and thats the main downside.

  • admin

    Correct; agreed . . . see also Apple Lossless format which is basically a lossless version of AAC (and I think also related to a similar Dolby AC3 lossless spec? can't remember off the top of my head).

    Lossless compression is still compression, however, by definition.

  • AAL

    Excuse me.

    Can I ask that "How much is iDJ2?"

    And "How get that?"

    Do you know that?

    Please, reply:)

  • champamoore

    if the quality is good, i'll be picking one up. i was wondering when somebody was going to do this.

    i'd heard rumours about pioneer's cdj having something similar in the works, and was salivating over that a while ago.

    i do wish rane or somebody similar would pick up this gauntlet, though. numark makes decent home mixers, but audio quality was good at best…

    none of of the product descriptions mention anything about outputs, etc. that pros need to know about…

  • naXzi

    Some info I'd like to know:

    1) Will there be accurate search for loop trim?

    2) What is the load time per track, for searching and overall?

    3) Can it load the same song on both channels and play simultaneously (beatjuggle)?

    4) Does the manual BPM tap on the console save it to the id3 tag on the iPod?

    5) What are the list of iPods compatible to it?

  • When I load my external hard drive into the usb port, the idj2 will read will not support writting files. I do not know why this is happening, if someone has experienced this problem or know why could you please help.