I think there’s a common myth that music production tools somehow take away from the need to understand music theory. I’d say exactly the opposite: they’re more demanding.

Every musician is now in the position of composer. You have an opportunity to arrange new sounds in new ways without any clear frame from the past. You’re now part of a community of listeners who have more access to traditions across geography and essentially from the dawn of time. In other words, there’s almost no choice too obvious.

So I also believe that every musician and producer ought to have access to some of the privilege I’ve had in regards to learning music theory and ear training. And I find that when my own creativity is lacking, I go back to listening deeply to sound and music.

There are in fact many resources online for deepening your music knowledge, but it’s interesting at least to observe how a software maker like Ableton gets involved. Having already established a book (Making Music) and a conference that takes on these issues at least in part (Loop), they now have unveiled a browser-based learning tool.

https://learningmusic.ableton.com/

If you’re entirely new to music making, the tool will walk you through the basics of how rhythm, melody, and harmony work, from the fundamentals to a sprinkling of more advanced topics.

It’s a course in music theory and one in recent music history.

Oddly enough, it’s worth a browse through these topics even if you do have some musical training. The reason for that is the same reason likely to engage new users: there are great musical examples, from drum and bass classics to pop. I get the same kick out of going through these as I have in the past teaching music fundamentals. If you love music, the fundamentals never get old, and never get less profound.

It’s great fun breaking down bass lines and rhythm parts and musing on form in favorite songs.

There’s an important question to ask here, though: why Ableton?

The Learning Music site makes its own argument for that.

First, this is really Ableton software – and Ableton is first and foremost a software company. That might not be immediately obvious, but from navigation to interactive tools that let you play with pitch and rhythm and even export to Ableton Live, it’s clear that Ableton’s competency in software is relevant.

patternswithpitch

goodlife

Of course, part of what makes Ableton who they are is also their design language and clarity, and that’s also a major part of the presentation and user experience.

And there’s something to learn from this. You see what Ableton is as they extend outside of Ableton Live, in regards to providing experiences in browsers and mobile. And you see, conversely, what browsers and mobile can do in teaching music. There are plenty of interactive learning examples online, but I think that “export” feature – the ability to integrate with serious desktop features – represents a kind of breakthrough.

At the same time, let me raise a serious concern here.

The richness of music knowledge is something we’ve received because of healthy music communities and music institutions, because of a network of overlapping ecosystems. And it’s important that many of these are independent. I think it’s great that software companies are getting into the action, and I hope they continue to do so. In fact, I think that’s one healthy part of the present ecosystem.

It’s the rest of the ecosystem that’s worrying – the one outside individual brands and what they support. Public music education is getting squeezed in different ways all around the world. Independent content production is, too, even in advertising-supported publications like this one, but more so in other spheres. Worse, I think education around music technology hasn’t even begun to be reconciled with traditional music education – in the sense that people with specialties in one field tend not to have any understanding of the other. And right now, we need both – and both are getting their resources squeezed.

This might feel like I’m going on a tangent, but if your DAW has to teach you how harmony works, it’s worth asking the question – did some other part of the system break down?

So here’s my hope. I hope that music educators check out Ableton’s Learning Music. I hope you do, too. I think it’s a reminder even to me of the importance of sharpening my own ears and sharing that knowledge with others, and I’ve been saturated in this for a long, long time.

But I hope we also start a bigger conversation in the music technology industry about the state of music education, knowledge, and documentation. We should both consider what we can do internally (as Ableton did with this site, and as CDM can do in its own ways), and what solutions lie beyond us, too.

I think Ableton doing this site might be an extra spark to making that happen.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, while playing around with this I randomly came up with a melodic figure I really like, and I want to develop it into something. Time to fire up Ableton Live.

  • Aaron Dishner

    I agree whole-heartedly about the disconnect in music education- both in the traditional sense and in the “modern/non-classical” sense. I think Ableton has done a good job showing how these two different aspects are really one, how both inform the other and provide interesting insights into how music works.

    I happen to be a teacher that uses Ableton and Push in a high school class. Over the course of me teaching the class, I have been continuously thinking about how I can combine the classical and non-classical divide instead of doing them separately. In my opinion, Push makes teaching theory easier to a degree. The visual nature of it, the layout, subdivisions, scales, chord shapes- it all lends itself easily to foundational theory concepts. For those that don’t have a Push in the classroom, there are bridges into theory concepts built into Live. Do some thinking and digging. It’s worth it.

    • Oh, definitely. And having taught via traditional techniques, in many, many ways this is more exciting to me – and no less musical / relevant.

  • “This might feel like I’m going on a tangent, but if your DAW has to teach you how harmony works, it’s worth asking the question – did some other part of the system break down?”

    I see your point, but I’m not sure the system is broken at all. Perhaps our requirements of what a culture “should do” needs some recalibrating?

    If a person doesn’t need to know the mechanics of Harmony to realize his musical ideas, and if his musical ideas don’t motivate/inspire him to want to learn more, then what is the value of Harmony? And, to extend, why should my concept of value be culturally lauded over others, who don’t see its value at all?

    I’d look at the “problem” in a different way. People should be free. If their freedom is being restrained to the extent that they cannot learn Harmony, “then” we have a cultural break down.

    But isn’t suggesting that “education” always improves a political card trick that is so unchallenged it automatically feels like a devastating argument?

    • Well, I think there is a disconnect … in that even people privileged enough to buy Ableton Live often don’t have the privilege of a decent music education. And that’s before we get to the many people who don’t have access to a product like Live or the computer on which to run it.

      These things are mutually compatible, for sure! So that isn’t to fault Ableton.

      But rather, I think we should look at online accessibility of materials for the larger public, and at publicly-supported / open content. There’s some out there. There could be more. And accessibility (on different devices, and for people with different vision – hearing – motion – etc.) should be an issue too.

      So I point that out *partly* because I think Ableton’s efforts are pretty decent benchmark for what that could look like.

  • partofthepuzzle

    Thanks for pointing this one out, Peter.

    I think this web tool from Ableton is a nice effort. I recently started working with a friend to do some production work. He has has a tremendous range of knowledge of several genres of music and a huge record collection and lots of great ideas. However, he has no technical musical education or experience with production tools. I think this web site will be great intro to some essential concepts, as well as in introductory exposure to how programs like Live work.

  • itchy

    its a cool tool to get people started and im sure there maybe a trick or idea for an old dog as well. looking forward to next version of ableton tho thats for sure.

  • AKM

    I can look at it from a side, as a classically graduated person. I give it 10 out of 10, I find it amazing. It really covers it all allowing virtually unlimited level of understanding and ability to dive as deep as anyone wish.

  • Neil

    It is kind of weird that Ableton – the software company – is doing this, rather than one of the publishing companies who run tutorials in their magazines, all the time.

    *Disclosure*

    Back in the day, I coded a load of chord finders and other widgets for a Big Magazine Publisher™, using Javascript and DHTML. Yes it was that long ago.

    It was all binned, of course, when B.M.P.™ decided their Web site was a ‘Portal’ rather than a resource in its own right.